home Online services How much does each task in social studies give. Announcement of official results. The structure of the exam in social science

How much does each task in social studies give. Announcement of official results. The structure of the exam in social science

Criteria for evaluating assignments in social studies USE 2019

with extended answer

Correct answers to three questions - 2 points.
Correct answers to any two questions - 1 point
Any one question is answered correctly. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 2

in social science is assessed:

Correctly explained and answered two questions - 2 points.
Any two elements of the answer are correctly given - 1 point
Any one element of the answer is correct. OR OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 2

in social science is assessed:

Two sources (paths) are correctly named and 2 examples are given (total 4 examples) - 3 points.
Two sources (paths) are correctly named, any 2-3 examples are given - 2 points.
One or two sources (paths) are correctly named, any 1 example is given. OR 1 source (path) is correctly named and 2 examples corresponding to it are given - 1 point
All responses that do not meet the above criteria for scoring 1, 2, and 3 points. OR Reasonings of a general nature that do not meet the requirements of the task are given. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social science is assessed:

Three functions are correctly named and explained - 3 points.
Two or three functions are correctly named, two of them are explained - 2 points.
One or three functions are correctly named, one of them is explained. OR Only three functions are correctly named - 1 point
Only one or two functions are correctly named. OR Reasonings of a general nature that do not meet the requirements of the task are given. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social science is assessed:

25.1 Disclosure of the meaning of the concept - 2 points

Explanation of the meaning / definition of the concept is given completely, clearly, clearly, unambiguously: the essential features related to the characteristic are indicated this concept/ distinguishing it from other concepts (the content of the concept is correctly disclosed through the generic affiliation of the concept and its specific difference(s)) - 2 points.
The meaning of the concept as a whole is disclosed, but in an incomplete volume: only one of the essential features relating to the characteristics of this concept / distinguishing it from other concepts is indicated, OR there are some inaccuracies / shortcomings in the answer that do not distort it in essence - 1 point
In the answer, along with the correct ones, incorrect signs (characteristics, descriptions, comparisons, etc.) are given that distort the content of the concept in essence. OR There are no specific characteristics, essential features of the concept / only non-essential features are indicated that do not reveal the meaning of the concept. OR Other situations not provided for by the rules for assigning 2 and 1 points - 0 points.

Grading guidelines:

Not counted: - a characteristic of a generic affiliation, repeating the concept, the meaning of which must be revealed; - as an essential characteristic, a sign already contained in the formulation of the task; - explanation of the meaning / definition of the concept through negation or only through the etymology of the word, metaphor or allegory.
If according to criterion 25.1 (disclosure of the meaning of the concept), 0 points are given, then according to criterion 25.2, 0 points are given.

25.2 Availability and quality of proposals containing information about various aspects of the concept - 2 points

Two sentences have been drawn up, each of which contains information that is correct from the point of view of scientific social science about the aspects of the concept that correspond to the requirement of the task - 2 points.
One sentence has been drawn up containing information that is correct from the point of view of scientific social science about any aspect of the concept in accordance with the requirement of the task - 1 point
- 0 points.

Grading Instructions:

The assessment does not count:

sentences containing essential errors that distort the meaning of the concept and / or its individual aspects;
proposals that reveal relevant aspects at the household level, without involving social science knowledge;
phrases, uncommon sentences.

Maximum score - 4

in social science is assessed:

Three functions are correctly named and illustrated with examples - 3 points.
Two or three functions are correctly named, two of them are illustrated with examples - 2 points.
One to three functions are correctly named, one of them is illustrated by example(s) - 1 point
Only one or three functions are correctly named. OR Any number of examples are given without specifying functions. OR Reasonings of a general nature that do not meet the requirements of the task are given. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social science is assessed:

The sphere, type of stratification and three criteria are correctly indicated - 3 points.
The sphere, type of stratification and one or two criteria are correctly indicated. OR The sphere and three criteria are correctly indicated - 2 points.
The scope and type of stratification are correctly indicated. OR The sphere and one or two criteria are correctly indicated - 1 point
Only the sphere is correct. OR The scope is not specified (incorrectly specified), regardless of the presence of other elements of the answer. OR Reasonings of a general nature that do not meet the requirements of the task are given. OR Wrong answer - 0 points.

Maximum score - 3

in social science is assessed:

28.1 Disclosure of the topic on the merits - 3 points

A complex plan contains at least three points, including two points, the presence of which will allow to reveal this topic in essence. Both of these "obligatory" points are detailed in sub-points, allowing to reveal this topic in essence - 3 points.
A complex plan contains at least three points, including two points, the presence of which will allow to reveal this topic in essence. Only one of these "obligatory" points is detailed in sub-points, allowing to reveal this topic in essence - 2 points.
A complex plan contains at least three points, including only one point, the presence of which will allow to reveal this topic in essence. This "mandatory" clause is detailed in sub-clauses, allowing to reveal this topic in essence - 1 point
All other situations not covered by the rules for scoring 2 and 1 points. OR Cases when the graduate's answer in form does not meet the requirements of the task (for example, it is not drawn up in the form of a plan with points and sub-points highlighted) - 0 points.

Grading guidelines:

Paragraphs/subparagraphs that are abstract and formal in nature and do not reflect the specifics of the topic are not counted in the assessment.
If criterion 28.1 scores 0, then criterion 28.2 scores 0

28.2 Correctness of wording of paragraphs and subparagraphs of the plan - 1 point

The wording of the points and sub-points of the plan is correct and does not contain errors, inaccuracies - 1
All other situations 0

Maximum score - 4

in social science is assessed:

29.1 Disclosure of the meaning of the statement - 1 point.

The meaning of the statement is revealed: one or more main ideas related to the content of the social science course are correctly identified and / or one or more theses are formulated in the context of the statement, which (s) requires (s) justification - 1 point
The meaning of the statement is not disclosed: not a single main idea is singled out / not a single thesis is formulated. OR The highlighted idea, the formulated thesis do not reflect the meaning of the statement / the meaning of the statement is replaced by general reasoning (“homemade”) that does not reflect the specifics of the proposed statement. OR The disclosure of the meaning is replaced by a direct retelling / paraphrasing of the given statement / consistent explanation of each word in the statement without explaining the meaning of the statement as a whole - 0 points.

Grading Instructions:

If according to criterion 29.1 (disclosure of the meaning of the statement), 0 points are given, then 0 points are given for all other evaluation criteria.

29.2 Theoretical content of the mini-essay - 2 points.

(explanation of the key concept(s), availability and correctness of theoretical provisions)

In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, explanations of the key concept(s) and theoretical provisions are given that are correct from the point of view of scientific social science (without errors) - 2 points.
In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, explanations of the key concept(s) that are correct from the point of view of scientific social science (without errors) are given, theoretical provisions are not presented. OR In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, theoretical provisions that are correct from the point of view of scientific social science (without errors) are given, the meaning of the key concept(s) is not disclosed. OR In the given explanations of the key concept(s) / theoretical provisions, there are certain inaccuracies that do not distort the scientific meaning of these concepts, theoretical provisions - 1 point
All other situations not provided for by the rules for scoring 2 and 1 points, including if there is no theoretical content of the mini-essay: the meaning of the key concept(s) is not explained, the theoretical provisions are not given or are not related to the main idea / the thesis, do not reveal the meaning of the statement. OR Reasonings of an everyday nature are given without relying on social science knowledge - 0 points.

Grading Instructions:

If criterion 29.2 scores 0, then criterion 29.3 scores 0.

29.3 Theoretical content of the mini-essay: the presence and correctness of reasoning, conclusions - 1 point.

In the context of at least one highlighted idea / one thesis, based on the correct explanation(s) of the key concept(s), the theoretical provisions are given consistent and consistent reasoning related to each other, on the basis of which a reasonable and reliable from the point of view of scientific social science conclusion - 1 point
All other situations, including reasoning and conclusions of an everyday nature without relying on social science knowledge - 0 points.

29.4 The quality of the facts and examples given - 2 points.

At least two correct, detailed formulated facts / examples are given from various sources, confirming the illustrated idea / thesis / position / reasoning / conclusion and not duplicating each other in content. There is a clear connection of each fact / example with the idea / thesis / position / reasoning / conclusion given in the essay - 2 points.
Only one correct, detailed formulated fact/example is given, confirming the illustrated idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion. There is a clear connection between this fact/example and the idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion given in the essay. OR Correct, detailed facts/examples are given from sources of the same type, confirming the illustrated idea/thesis/position/reasoning/conclusion. There is a clear connection of each fact / example with the idea / thesis / position / reasoning / conclusion given in the essay. OR Two examples are given from sources of different types, duplicating each other in content. There is a clear connection of each fact / example with the idea / thesis / position / reasoning / conclusion given in the essay - 1 point
All other situations not covered by the rules for scoring 2 and 1 points
0 - 0 points.

Grading Instructions:

As sources, facts of public life (including media reports), personal social experience (including books read, films watched), materials can be used. subjects(history, geography, etc.).

Examples from different subjects are considered as examples from different sources.
Facts/examples containing factual and semantic errors that led to a significant distortion of the essence of the statement or indicate a misunderstanding of the historical, literary, geographical and (or) other material used are not counted in the assessment.

Maximum score - 6

Each graduate is well aware that in order to successfully enter the specialty of interest, it is necessary to prepare well for the Unified State Examination 2018 and score the highest possible points. What does it mean to “pass the exam well” and how many points will be enough to compete for a budget place in a particular university? This will be discussed in this article.

We will cover the following important questions:

First of all, it is important to understand what exists:

the minimum score that gives the right to receive a certificate;
the minimum score that allows you to apply to the university;
the minimum score sufficient for real income to the budget in a particular specialty at a particular university in Russia.

Naturally, these figures differ significantly.

Minimum certification score

The minimum attestation scores of the Unified State Examination are set for compulsory subjects - the Russian language and mathematics at the basic level, and in 2018 are:

Having overcome this threshold, but not reaching the minimum test score, the examinee will receive a certificate, but will not be able to apply to the university.

Minimum test score

The test minimum is the threshold value that gives the right to enter the university. In other words, persons who have overcome the test threshold theoretically have the right to join the fight for budget places. Although, in practice, it is almost impossible to enter highly rated universities with minimal performance.

In 2018, in all subjects except the Russian language and basic mathematics test minimum scores of the USE coincide with the attestation ones and are:

Subject	Minimum test score
Russian language
Maths ( a basic level of)
Mathematics (profile level)
Social science

Literature


Foreign language
Biology
Informatics
Geography

The principle of calculating the success of passing the unified state exam assumes that the subject must demonstrate a high, average or sufficient level of knowledge, corresponding to grades "5", "4" and "3" in the school scale.

In case of an unsatisfactory result, as well as when passing a score that the examinee considers insufficient for himself, graduates are given the right to retake the exam.

Minimum score for admission to the budget

Most universities announce the threshold score required for applicants for a budget place. This allows each applicant to realistically assess the prospects for admission and choose universities and specialties based on the points scored in the USE.

In 2018, you can focus on the fact that last season the average passing scores for all USE subjects among applicants who entered MGIMO and other highly rated universities in the capital, fluctuated between the threshold value of 80-90. But, for most regional universities of the Russian Federation, 65-75 points can already be considered a competitive result.

Converting the primary score to the resulting one

By completing the tasks proposed in the USE ticket, the examinee gains the so-called primary scores, the maximum value of which varies depending on the subject. When evaluating the level of knowledge, such primary scores are converted into the resulting ones, which are entered in the certificate and are basic upon admission.

By using online calculator, you can compare primary and test scores in subjects of interest.

Just like last year, in 2018, the points scored while passing the USE affect the score of the certificate and, although the table for comparing the test score and traditional marks has not been officially adopted, you can roughly compare your scores right now using a universal calculator.

Passing scores of the top 10 universities in Russia

		total
	Moscow State University them. M.V. Lomonosov
	Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
	National Research Nuclear University MEPhI
	Saint Petersburg State University
	Moscow state institute international relations
	National Research University " graduate School economy"
	Moscow State Technical University named after N.E. Bauman
	National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University
	Novosibirsk National Research State University
	St. Petersburg Polytechnic University of Peter the Great

Please note that the average passing scores for different specialties in the same university can vary significantly. This figure reflects the minimum score of applicants who entered the budget, and tends to change every year. The results of 2017 can only serve as a guideline for applicants in 2018, motivating them to achieve the highest possible results.

There are many factors that affect the minimum passing score, including:

the total number of graduates who have applied and the scores indicated on their certificates;
the number of applicants who provided original documents;
the number of beneficiaries.

So, seeing your last name in 20th place in the list of specialty, providing for 40 budget places, you can safely consider yourself a student. But, even if you find yourself on this list of 45, there is no reason to be upset if among those standing in front of you there are 5-10 people who provided copies of documents, because most likely these people are tuned to another university and applied for this specialty as a fallback .

Hundreds of thousands of graduates will take USE in social studies 2017. As you can see, there is not much time left for preparation, and although this subject is considered relatively easy, it is advisable to start working on tasks right now. Note that social science is the most popular optional subject, which is extremely fond of students. In addition, many liberal arts universities require a grade for this discipline in the graduate certificate.

So that students do not relax in the bowels of the Ministry of Education and Science, as well as in the State Duma, they have already begun to develop a number of innovations that can change the social science testing system in order.

Changes

The innovations listed below can still be regarded as rumors and conjectures, but this can happen and already in 2017 they will all be involved in the procedure passing the exam in social science.

Social science - compulsory subject. This proposal has long been on the lips of specialists close to the education system in Russia. In addition to this subject, history, physics and foreign language. Of course, history has more chances, because officials are already extremely concerned that not all students are fluent in the history of the development and formation of their state.
Introduction of an extensive oral part. This innovation is still at the stage of discussion. The parliamentarians intend to shorten the test part, and put oral blocks in its place, which the student will have to hand over personally to the examiner. Let's say more, some experts suggest making this exam oral.
The subject will be removed from the exam. Yes, such a proposal has already been submitted to the State Duma for consideration. This is due to the fact that every year it becomes less technical workers. In order for more graduates to enter specialized universities for some time, social science may disappear from the list of subjects submitted to the exam. Let's hope that this innovation will remain only at the stage of conversations.

Evaluation criteria

In 2017, the graduate knowledge assessment system will not undergo any changes. For each completed task, the student receives a certain number of points, which are combined into a single amount. Thanks to a specially designed scale, the primary ones received by the student are transformed into test ones. It is on the basis of the latter that the commission decides whether the graduate has passed the exam or not.

The structure of the exam in social science

In total, the exam in this subject provides for 29 tasks, divided into two blocks.

Tasks 1-20 (block 1) - questions or tasks that require short answers in one word or one number.

Tasks 21-29 (block 2) - each question requires a detailed reasonable answer. Examples, arguments and other evidence are welcome to make the answer broad and correct.

As a rule, this state exam tests knowledge in the following sections:

Man and society
Right
Economy
Politicians
social relations

Literature for preparation

To pass the Unified State Exam in social studies with excellent marks, you need to spend a lot of time reading books. Given the fact that more than one subject is submitted for the exam, the correct literature should be selected so as not to waste time on inappropriate manuals. Below is a list of textbooks that will certainly come in handy while preparing for the exam.

This literature is designed specifically for those who want to prepare in advance for the exam. Some manuals are aimed at the formation of correct theoretical knowledge. They have all the sections that are submitted to the exam. It is noteworthy that all information is presented in a short form, focusing on the main theses.

Demo version of the exam in social studies

If you want to feel for a while how it is to pass the exam in social studies, FIPI specialists update the demo version of the exam every year. Each eleventh grader can visually assess the complexity of the test, as well as get acquainted with the approximate tasks. In addition, students will be able to earn points for completing the demo.

This approach allows you to prepare graduates for the future and set it up for positive result knowledge checks.

It's worth noting that the demo is just a rough picture of what to expect on a real social studies exam. The demo version usually includes the following items:

Instructions with the rules for filling out forms
Information about the blocks that are included in the social studies exam
Criteria for assessing knowledge
The amount of time allotted for the student to solve all problems
List of literature that can be used during preparation for the test
Rules of conduct for students during the exam
The total number of tasks in all blocks of the exam in social studies.

conclusions

So that every student secondary school was able to feel confident in the exam in this subject, it is necessary to start preparing for it now. The method of preparation depends on the capabilities and desires of the eleventh grader.

Someone turns to tutors for help, someone decides to read specialized literature and prepare for the test on their own, someone, united in groups, repeats and consolidates the material covered step by step. It does not matter which method you choose, the main thing is that it brings the desired result.

Videos news

Society is constantly discussing about the exam. Some are convinced that we need to cancel the exam and return to Soviet system student examinations. However, there is another point of view: the USE allows you to check the level of knowledge of students and give way to graduates from the provinces to enter prestigious metropolitan universities. To date, there are two mandatory exams - Russian language and mathematics. Next, the graduate chooses from school curriculum those subjects, the results of which must be presented at the selected university. The Unified State Examination in Social Studies 2019 is interesting because it is integrated and allows graduates to feel like a lawyer, sociologist, economist, political scientist or lawyer.

Important documents

The preparation of students for the Unified State Exam in social studies should be based on several documents, which can be found on the FIPI website:

No. p / p	Document's name
1	specifier
2	Codifier
3	Demonstrative option

On the FIPI website, you can also find information about the date of the exam and solve the options for KIMs.

What can be learned from the Specification?

From this document you can find out that this exam consists of 29 tasks. 20 of them - in part 1, 9 - in the second.

In the first part, 20 tasks have a maximum primary score- 35. And the tasks of the second part -29.

Codifier

The Codifier has a short list of legal acts that you need to get acquainted with:

Knowledge of these documents is necessary in order to successfully pass the exam in social studies and get high results.

Demonstrative option

Demo version of the exam in social studies is needed in order to get acquainted with the approximate types of tasks that will be in the control and measuring materials directly on the exam.

Much attention should be paid here to the system of evaluation of examination papers. This is necessary so that the graduate clearly understands how exactly it is necessary to complete the tasks of the 2nd part, where there is a detailed answer.

If an eleventh grader sees two question marks in an assignment, then two answers must be given.

About the task structure

Tasks 1 - 3 (basic level) and task 20 are conceptual, checking the level of preparation of graduates.

4-6 - these are tasks that are aimed at testing the formation of the skills of students in grade 11 in the topic "Man and Society", including knowledge and spiritual culture.

7-10 is Economics.

11-12 - "Social relations".

13-15 - tasks from the "Politics" area. Always in task No. 14, positions from the Codifier 4.14 and 4.1 are checked. (“Bodies state power RF" and "Federal structure of the Russian Federation").

16-19 are assignments on the topic "Law". You can be sure that task 16 is always aimed at knowing the basics of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation. Each graduate of the school must be an active citizen of our state, understanding in which state he lives, knowing the foundations of his state, the rights and obligations guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

Part 2 (9 tasks) represents in total the basic social Sciences, forming the entire course of high school:

Philosophy.
Sociology.
Political science.

Tasks 21 - 24 are combined into one composite task with a fragment of a popular science text, aimed at testing the ability to find the main thing from the text.

Tasks No. 21 and No. 22 strictly according to the text. You only need to find the sentence that contains the answer.

In task 23 it is given additional task for this text, for example:

illustrate any provision in the text with an example;
give an appropriate argument, etc.

The 24th task involves the use of text information, but knowledge of the course "Social Studies" as a whole is also required.

The 25th task tests the ability to reveal key social science concepts. The graduate must here show the semantic basis of the concept, highlight the main idea.

No. 26 tests the ability to concretize the studied theoretical positions and concepts with examples. Examples are an opportunity for experts to see how theoretical knowledge a graduate can apply in life.

Task 27 requires the analysis of the information presented, including statistical, graphic, explanation of the relationship of social objects.

The 28th task is a detailed answer on the topic. A student of the 11th grade must systematically show what he knows on the topic. In 2018, 1 point was added in the grading system to this task (4 points in total for the task). There should be three points of the plan, two of which are disclosed in subparagraphs.

The last task, No. 29, is an alternative one (presented in five options). This is a mini essay. It is necessary to choose one statement from the presented ones and reveal the meaning of the statement, present the theoretical content, identifying key concepts and illustrate with examples and facts. Here, since 2018, 1 point has been added, dedicated to the correctness of the use of theoretical concepts, provisions and reasoning.

Changes in the exam in society

In 2018, there were some changes in the social studies exam assessment system.

The maximum primary score that can be scored on the Unified State Exam in social studies is 64 points.

About 5 social science life hacks that will help you pass the exam, you can see here:

Ahead 2018-2019 academic year, which will be the graduation for many Russian schoolchildren who are already concerned about the successful completion of the Unified state exam and successful admission to a good university.

We will tell you how exam papers are checked in various subjects, how the scale for converting USE scores into grades works, and what innovations can be expected in 2019.

Principles for evaluating the work of the USE 2019

For several recent years the USE system in a number of subjects has undergone significant changes and has been brought to the optimal (according to the organizers) format, which makes it possible to fully assess the amount of knowledge of a graduate in a particular subject.

No fundamental changes are expected in 2018-2019, and we can say with confidence that the same principles will be applied to evaluate the work of graduates as in 2017-2018:

automated verification of forms;
involvement of experts in checking tasks with detailed answers.

How does the computer evaluate?

First part examination work suggests a short answer to the questions posed, which USE participant must be entered on a special answer sheet.

Important! Before starting work, be sure to read the rules for filling out the form, as an incorrectly executed work will not pass an automated check.

It is quite difficult to challenge the result of a computer check. If the work was not counted due to the fault of the participant who incorrectly filled out the form, the result is equated to unsatisfactory.

How do experts evaluate?

In many subjects, in addition to the test part, there are tasks that require a full detailed answer. Since it is impossible to automate the process of checking such answers, experts are involved in the verification - experienced teachers with a long work experience.

Checking USE teacher does not know (and even great wish cannot find out), whose work lies before him and in what city (region) it was written. Verification is carried out on the basis of uniform assessment criteria developed specifically for each subject. Each work is checked by two experts. If the experts agree, the assessment is put on the form, but if independent appraisers disagree, then a third expert is involved in the verification, whose opinion will be decisive.

That is why it is important to write legibly and accurately so that there is no ambiguous interpretation of words and phrases.

Primary and test scores

Based on the results of the check, the USE participant is credited with a certain amount primary points, which are then converted to text (scores for the entire test). In different subjects, a different maximum of primary points is provided, depending on the number of tasks. But after bringing the result according to the corresponding table, the USE participant receives the final test score, which is the official result of his final tests (maximum 100 points).

So, in order to pass the exam, it is enough to score the established minimum threshold for the initial score:

	Minimum points
	primary	test
Russian language
Mathematics (profile)


Informatics
Social science
Foreign languages

Biology
Geography
Literature

Focusing on these numbers, you can accurately understand that the exam has been passed. But what kind of assessment? The 2018 online scale will help you with this, designed specifically for converting primary USE scores into test ones, which will also be relevant for the results of 2019. A handy calculator can be found on the website 4ege.ru.

Announcement of official results

Graduates are always concerned about the question - how quickly can you find out what result was obtained when passing and what will be the scale for converting points scored on the exam into traditional grades in 2019.

Teachers are often taken to reassure students by working through the tasks of the USE tickets immediately after the exam and evaluating the quality of the work done by the pupils and the amount of primary points scored. Official results must be expected for 8-14 days, according to the established regulations for the USE-2019. On average, the organizers approve the following inspection schedules:

3 days to check the work;
5-6 days for information processing at the federal level;
1 working day to approve the results of the SEC;
3 days to post results online and transfer data to educational institutions.

In the event of unforeseen situations and technical problems, these terms may be revised.

You can find out the owl score:

directly at your school;
on the check.ege.edu.ru portal;
on the gosuslugi.ru website.

Converting points to grade

Since 2009, the results of the USE have not been included in the graduate certificate. Therefore, today there is no official state system transferring the USE result into an assessment on a school 5-point scale. As part of the introductory campaign, the test score scored in the exam is always summed up and taken into account. But, many students are still interested to know how they passed the exam - 3 or 4, 4 or 5. For this, there is a special table that details the correspondence for each of the 100 points for each of the subjects.

Ratings Using such a table is quite inconvenient. It is much easier to find out how you passed the Russian language, mathematics or history using the 4ege.ru online calculator, which also contains the USE score conversion scale, which is relevant for 2019 graduates.

Having received the result of the exam, it is worth deciding on the university as soon as possible, comparing your capabilities with the real competition for the specialties of interest. Thus, the practice of past years shows that in some cases it is difficult to get into the most popular areas in the capital's universities even with high scores, because not only holders of 100-point USE results, and winners of the largest Olympiads of the 2018-2019 academic year.